Stephen Hawking Admits Intelligent Design Is ‘Highly Probable’

The English theoretical physicist and cosmologist Stephen Hawking surprised the scientific community last week when he announced during a speech at the University of Cambridge that he believed that “some form of intelligence” was actually behind the creation of the Universe.

Presenting himself before students at the University of Cambridge, the world-famous scientist declared that his years of research on the creation of the cosmos have led him to isolate a strange scientific factor which he says is in many ways contrary to the universal laws of physics.

This strange phenomenon, which he names the God factor, would be at the origin of the creation process and would have played a great role in determining the actual form of the Universe.


The world renown scientist admits the near-death experience of his brother, who was clinically dead for 43 minutes after a heart attack last October, radically changed his view on the nature of human consciousness and the Universe as a whole

“My brother has always been a role model for me. His rational, cunning and no non-sense mind has shaped my personality into the person I am today and has led me into the study of the fascinating world of physics. But since his accident last October, he has come back a changed man” he recalled.

“He has told me of the existence of a sentient being, of another world we mortals are unaware of, he has told me of God” he told the crowd, visibly surprised at such affirmations.

“Modern science relies on the perception that consciousness lies within the human brain, but what my brother experienced during his clinical death, I cannot explain.”

“Does consciousness lie outside of the human body? Is the human brain just a receptor, capable of receiving the “consciousness wave” as AM/FM radios receive radio waves?” he asked the crowd.

“These are questions modern science has not yet answered and could redefine our view of the Universe and modern physics completely” he acknowledged.


“We were not expecting this,” told the Head of the Department of Astrophysics, John Bairns. “I am simply baffled, I don’t know what to say,” he told local reporters

“In my 40 years as a physicist, the thought of the Universe being “a living entity” never crossed my mind. I admit, Dr. Hawking has given us much to ponder about” admitted Professor John Bairns, politely.

These declarations by the award-winning cosmologist have caused a great commotion in the scientific community, some even publicly admitting that “it was time for him to retire” and that “even great minds fall short in time”.

Stephen Hawking has since published a rebuttal to his critics, insisting that “Intelligent design” doesn’t in any way prove that God exists, but only that a “God-like force” played a role in the creation of our Universe, approximately 13.8 billion years ago.

5 Comments on "Stephen Hawking Admits Intelligent Design Is ‘Highly Probable’"

  1. In the Bible .
    Lift up your eyes and look to the heavens: Who created all these? He who brings out the starry host one by one and calls forth each of them by name. Because of his great power and mighty strength, not one of them is missing.

  2. Could not the Big Bang be the conseption of the universe a bit like a human conception
    From a nothing start to grow into a being with billions of atoms and millions life forms
    And like a universe we grow outwards from a single unit to full grown and like other universes it slows does as it gets older ?

  3. I never understood why science has been trying for so long to disprove the existence of God. What if humans aren’t the supreme beings. I think that if lesser beings than us exist it only stands to reason that greater beings also exist.

  4. I studied the Philosophy of Science at Uni. It stuck to logic. Evolution does not. It often meanders from logic.
    People tend to look up to other people as if they’re gods–i.e., royals, politicians, rock stars, actors and scientists, &c, though they are all fallible human beings, all of whom are here today and gone when they die.
    Some scientists will do anything to claim evoution is a fact but there’s still no concrete proof. Such “reasoning” is emotionalism which is hardly going by the Scientific Method! Emotionalism is not acceptable in a court of law, thankfully, and it should not be acceptable in scientific debate.

    • I fail to understand what emotion has to do with this. Science will try to explain things that can be reasoned. However, there are things (like the alpha and the omega) that cannot be explained by science, and they never will.

      I am not saying that there is a “god”. But there is something that our small minds cannot understand for some reason. The beginning and the end is what humanity is the constant search for us, humans. It is what keeps us alive. It’s the reason why we exist (in my humble opinion.)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.