Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900’s

A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover-up.

The cover-up allegedly destroyed evidence showing giant human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America.

The pieces of evidence were ordered to be destroyed by high-level administrators to “protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time” according to the court ruling.

The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900’s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.

During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistleblowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology cannot admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churchward.

«There has been a major cover up by western archaeological institutions since the early 1900’s to make us believe that America was first colonized by Asian peoples migrating through the Bering Strait 15,000 years ago, when in fact, there are hundreds of thousands of burial mounds all over America which the Natives claim were there a long time before them, and that show traces of a highly developed civilization, complex use of metal alloys and where giant human skeleton remains are frequently found but still go unreported in the media and news outlets» he explains.


A giant human femur uncovered in Ohio in 2011 by the American Association for Alternative Archeology, similar to the evidence presented in court

A turning point of the court case was when a 1.3-meter long human femur bone was shown as evidence in court of the existence of such giant human bones.

The evidence came as a blow to the Smithsonian’s lawyers as the bone had been stolen from the Smithsonian by one of their high-level curators in the mid-1930’s who had kept the bone all his life and which had admitted on his deathbed in writing of the undercover operations of the Smithsonian.

«It is a terrible thing that is being done to the American people,» he wrote in the letter.

«We are hiding the truth about the forefathers of humanity, our ancestors, the giants who roamed the earth as recalled in the Bible and ancient texts of the world».

The US Supreme Court has since forced the Smithsonian Institution to publicly release classified information about anything related to the “destruction of evidence pertaining to the mound builder culture” and to elements “relative to human skeletons of greater height than usual”, a ruling the AIAA is extremely enthused about.

«The public release of these documents will help archaeologists and historians to reevaluate current theories about human evolution and help us greater our understanding of the mound builder culture in America and around the world» explains AIAA director, Hans Guttenberg.

«Finally, after over a century of lies, the truth about our giant ancestors shall be revealed to the world» he acknowledges, visibly satisfied by the court ruling.

The documents are scheduled to be released in 2020 and the operation will be coordinated by an independent scientific organization to assure political neutrality.

14 Comments on "Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900’s"

  1. The comments on this blog are amazing! Like reading literature of the 19th century! There are advancements in science since then, we have complex theories of how humans moved around and adapted to our surroundings. And none of them in any way related to the contemporary categories you are assigning them to. The bible was not even created at that time, there were no Jewish people, I am completely amazed at this conversation. Its not all bad, at least we all now know how ignorant people today in this advanced civilization can be!.

    • The bible was around before the 19th century. Wow!
      You’re right, the comments on this blog show how ignorant people can be!

    • MU is a good example of how either reading comprehension is lacking in people now days or people’s intent is just to lash out. Your comment does not state the bible was written in the 19th century (the old testament was written 1450 to 1410 BC) and the mound builder era is estimated to have originated around 3400 BCE so David is correct in his post.

    • Wow what a perfect dumbass!!!

      King Ramses II had a son who became pharaoh. His name was Merneptra. He left behind a war stele that cites a battle with the Hebrew nation of Israel,which had conquered Canaan.

      How’s that crow taste mr. Dumbass?

    • Um no…..the first texts( there was no single date for all the books in the old testament) Were as early as 3500 BC….so Marc….3400 would be later not before. Get over it.

  2. I can’t wait to find who these “people” were! How fascinating! BTW DB – well said. I don’t get why there is so much name calling, pointing fingers, and just plain nasty mouthed people out there. Is it that hard to be nice?

  3. WOW… I have read all of the comments. It never ceases to amaze me how many hateful people there are out there. Fortunately, some people can voice their opinions, regurgitate facts and cite scripture without feeling the need to bash others and be so cruel. Simply put, I think this was an interesting article and will be anxious to see how it plays out.

  4. sooooo,since when has anyone been able to determine skin color from bone matter? As for the giants, that puts the cat amongst the pigeons so to speak, need to re write Stonehenge, pyramids, Nazca, myan structures, Easter islands……the giants simply carried the stones there, maybe between two of them if they were heavy!!!! Friendly giants!

    • The Nazca lines were made by pilgramigers who walk it every year, Pyramids were made with a pulley system which was proven by a french archaeologist, stonehenge was made by early Europeans, Easter Island by the people who lived there(several carvings were found in process) so “Stands Alone”, do your research before you mouth off.

    • In response to your comment Dave…All of those theories are based on what we have been taught. But now that these “giants” have been proven to exist, I agree with Stands alone, these findings may very well change the whole theory on how these giant structures were built.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.