Belgium Parliament to Lower Age of Consent to 13


 Brussels | The Belgian Federal Parliament will vote this week on a motion which could lower the legal age of sexual consent from 16 to 13 years of age.

Laurent Cassius, member of the opposition, proposed the motion which “could free thousands of unjustly convicted prisoners” if the assembly decides to pass it.

“Our prisons are filled with young men that have been robbed of their youth, condemned to rot in jail for an act that should not be a crime. Why are we denying these young men the chance to play a more positive role in modern society?”, he asked before the assembly tuesday.

Some even argue that a law on the age of consent has become superfluous and should no longer exist

– Laurent Cassus

Outdated laws

Laws on pedophilia are outdated claims top German attorney, Hans Goldsberg.

“There will be the need for a consolidation of national laws under the current European system on the legal aspects of sex. Most of these national rulings don’t represent the modern social complexities of our times and are legally baseless. Some even argue that a law on the age of consent has become superfluous and should no longer exist” claims the lawyer who has worked for more than 35 years in his field of work.

“Just think about how 2,000 years ago the Greeks were a much more open society. We must remember that love between a man and a boy where not as taboo as today” explains cultural anthropologist, Thomas Black, from the University of Michigan.

Adults who have sex with underage children now face from two to six years in prison and up to 12 years according to current Belgian law if they have performed oral or penetrative sex. The age of consent vary by jurisdiction across Europe and are currently set between 13 and 18.

11 Comments on "Belgium Parliament to Lower Age of Consent to 13"

  1. Holy crap, look at all you people…
    You all for some reason get “consentual sex” confused with “rape”.
    I tell you what, I wanted nothing more than to have a bunch of crazy sex when I was 14, preferably with girls who were either my age, or older, adults included.
    I was already familiar with condoms and the idea of sex.
    This kind of law is to allow such relationships when the younger party CONSENTS to it.
    That is the whole point of the word CONSENT in the term AGE OF CONSENT.
    Now, I know a whole bunch of you are confused right now because you obviously thought “consent” was a word that meant “legal to have sex with, whether they want to or not”, and not, in fact, “permission for something to happen or agreement to do something”, which is what the word means.
    So, in case anyone is confused out there, this DOES NOT make it okay to rape teenage children.
    What this DOES DO is make it okay to have sex with a teenage child if they tell you that it is okay, or that they want you to.
    If the teenage child says “no”, “I don’t want to”, “please don’t”, “I don’t like that”, “stop, you’re hurting me”, “let me go”, etc., etc., then this becomes rape.
    This ALSO means that if any child UNDER the age of 13 consents to sex, it is still rape, as they are not of the age of CONSENT.

    If you still don’t get it, please read it again.
    I made it very clear.
    If teenage boys and girls want to have sex ANYONE, they are free to do so, and anyone is free to have sex with teenage boys and girls as long as those teenagers CONSENT to the act.


    • araya soma | May 20, 2014 at 8:19 pm |

      no one at that age consenting or not is mentally fit for sex sorry, i wanted sex when 14 defo not 13, but it did not make it right, instead parents should be teaching you about sacred sex how it is to do with love, and teaching exercises on how to retain your seed and how to MANAGE the SEXUAL energy in more creative and safe ways and not ejaculate, sadly most of the world is so fucked up sexually that most parents have never even heard of white tantric sex are totally insane to think 13 even 15 is fine even if children consent, they would only consent if bribed or hormones flying all over place i a moment of fucking madness

  2. I believe it should be a crime to take advantage of or be taken advantage of by a woman who hasn’t reached the requisite emotional and financial maturity to be independent and free from need to barter her object for marriage or commitment. To allow dependent women to breed legitimate dependent children will result in the objectification and infantilisation of once-brilliant children reduced into a state of lifelong dependency by a dependent mother who knows best how everyone must suffer to need / please her.

    I believe sleeping with a woman who isn’t independent should be serious crime. An infantilised mother who cannot take care of herself, let alone her children, steamrolling over the free will of her teenage children to decide for themselves, is effectively traumatic criminal assault. Overriding human free will is a far greater crime than letting humans make their own decisions.

    Women don’t protect teenage girls. They purge them with lies and shame and objectifying abuse to keep them away from male slaves. The abuse of teenage girls by women leaves every girl traumatised and hiding behind burqas and cosmetics for life, eroding their Self to the point where many are unable to have healthy trauma-free relationships for the rest of their lives. There’s no protection going on. Children must be protected from dependent mothers.

    Children need protection from racketeers.

    • I am curious as to what world you live in as that is one of the most ridiculous and over the top things I’ve ever heard. Obviously a chip on the shoulder about something. ‘Women don’t protect teenage girls’ what the hell.

    • You are literally insane.

    • Annette and No,

      Jonny, isn’t insane, although his experiences have dramatically altered what he perceives as reality.

      He has either witnessed, or experienced such accusations with a woman who must have been a huge influence in his childhood upbringing. Granted, he understands how such detrimental affects people, he hasn’t came to full terms with his own pain. Which has caused him to project his own experiences on others as if this is correct reality for all.

  3. These people enjoy the thrill of the illegal/the forbidden. Lower the age to 13 and they will go after 11-year-olds.

  4. It’s something unthinkable to legalize such a law. I am from Romania and I know that a lot of romanian children ( not gypsies) were abused by belgian, american or other nation “tourists”.
    What is the meaning of this? Why don’t introduce sexual education as a normal field of study in schools?

    • Women need girls to remain deceived about female reproductive biology or they cannot set them up to be traumatised by shame when they hit puberty.

      Women need girls kept in the dark about female reproductive biology or men could learn the Big Dirty Secret that women kill girls to keep men from learning.

      Sick, twisted world of sex-obsessed demons. That is why education and truth are rude in Polite Society.

    • Sfantul Gheorghe | May 24, 2014 at 6:43 pm |

      Buna Ziua! cititi Protocoalele de la Toronto!!!

  5. The more we claim knowledgeable, the no-tier we r becoming, God send us to mars!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.